The SIP standard's use of DNS SRV records has been explicitly constructed to handle with server failures. There may be multiple servers responsible for a domain and referred to by DNS. If it is impossible to communicate with a primary server, a client can proceed to another one. Backup servers may be located in a different geographic area to minimize risk caused by areal operational disasters: lack of power, flooding, earthquake, etc.

Unfortunately, at the moment of writing this documentation (end of December 2002) only very few SIP products actually implement the DNS fail-over mechanism. Unless networks with SIP devices supporting this mechanism are built, alternative mechanisms must be used to force clients to use backup servers. Such a mechanism is disconnecting primary server and replacing it with a backup server locally. It unfortunately precludes geographic dispersion and requires network multihoming to avoid dependency on single IP access. Another method is to update DNS when failure of the primary server is detected. The primary drawback of this method is its latency: it may take long time until all clients learn to use the new server.

No one really mails user@mailserver any more. We're mailing user@domain and the DNS MX records helps the mail client to send the mail to the correct mail server. Why should we call user@sip-proxy instead of using user@domain?

Remember that the later construction in addition to being user friendly, also adds redundancy, and with a proper DNS configuration also may add load balancing.